
While specific details of the decision are likely a few weeks away, the US Court of Federal Claims has denied an infamous Blue Origin lawsuit, upholding NASA’s decision to award SpaceX a contract to create a Starship-derived Moon lander.
The ruling ends almost seven months of delays explicitly caused by protests and lawsuits filed by competitors Dynetics and Blue Origin. Protests were first filed with the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) about a week after NASA announced in April 2021 that SpaceX would build theHuman Landing System. Both protests were denied in July but Blue Origin ultimately chose to double down and filed a lawsuit against NASA and SpaceX in August, kicking off a process guaranteed to cause several more months of delays.
NASA’s decision to contract with SpaceX alone defied most expectations, especially when the space agency ultimately explained that SpaceX’s Starship proposal was half the price of the next best option while simultaneously offering better management and more convincing technical expertise. More importantly, rather than attempting to deliver the bare minimum specifications NASA requested from HLS bidders, SpaceX’s Starship Moon lander went above and beyond, enabling potentially revolutionary performance magnitudes better than Blue Origin or Dynetics’ offerings.
Based on their redacted GAO protests, both of which contained a litany of frivolous arguments and dubiously relevant and self-unaware jabs at SpaceX, Blue Origin and Dynetics were furious about their losses. Aside from one minor nitpick, GAO wholly denied both protests, at which point Blue Origin took the matter to federal court rather than slink home, tail between its legs. In the interim between protest filing and GAO’s decision, Blue Origin also repeatedly tried to go behind NASA’s back by having sympathetic members of Congress tack on amendments to unrelated bills that would have forced the space agency to select a second HLS lander without guaranteeing the additional funding needed to pay for it.
Blue Origin owner and former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos even sent an unsolicited letter and proposal to NASA offering to pony up $2B of the ~$6B Moon it requested to develop a NASA Moon lander. SpaceX, on the other hand, did what NASA’s HLS request for proposal (RFP) explicitly asked of bidders and proposed to pay half of its Starship lander development costs in its original proposal, while Blue Origin instead attempted to milk as much money from NASA as possible under the delusional premise that NASA would then negotiate for a cheaper deal (illegal under basic contracting rules).
Later on, weeks into the lawsuit, redacted court filings revealed that Blue Origin had abandoned most of the arguments it put forth in its GAO protest and was instead leading with the claim that a few minor (but potentially valid) violations of contracting rules made by NASA and SpaceX in their limited post-award negotiations. It’s now clear that the presiding judge was far from convinced by that argument, instead ruling entirely in SpaceX and NASA’s favor and upholding the space agency’s HLS procurement process.
It remains to be seen if the judge was at all swayed by any of the several arguments Blue Origin threw at the wall, something that the court’s final redacted decision will hopefully clarify when it’s released around November 18th. In the meantime, it’s unclear when exactly NASA and SpaceX will be able to finally get back to work on HLS. Prior to the court’s decision, NASA’s voluntary stay of performance – preventing collaboration with SpaceX on its HLS contract – was scheduled to expire on November 8th.
The brief decisions can be read here (PDF) and here (PDF).

ivermectin 3mg for sale – buy carbamazepine 400mg sale buy tegretol 200mg for sale
order accutane for sale – order linezolid 600 mg for sale zyvox price
amoxil cheap – ipratropium cheap ipratropium where to buy
order azithromycin 250mg online cheap – order bystolic 20mg pill order bystolic pills
order generic omnacortil 40mg – azithromycin price progesterone 200mg oral
augmentin where to buy – cymbalta 40mg us duloxetine online buy
doxycycline price – acticlate medication buy generic glucotrol
clavulanate where to buy – augmentin 375mg pills duloxetine 40mg generic
semaglutide pill – buy cyproheptadine without a prescription cheap periactin
order tizanidine 2mg without prescription – buy microzide 25 mg generic order hydrochlorothiazide 25mg online
canadian cialis and healthcare – buy viagra for sale order sildenafil without prescription
sildenafil drug – brand tadalafil 20mg tadalafil 10mg pills
lipitor oral – buy atorvastatin 20mg lisinopril tablet
brand prilosec – lopressor oral atenolol 100mg usa
medrol 8mg pills – pregabalin pill buy triamcinolone 10mg generic
order desloratadine 5mg sale – buy priligy 30mg buy dapoxetine 30mg generic
misoprostol tablet – purchase orlistat online cheap diltiazem us
buy zovirax 800mg sale – allopurinol price rosuvastatin price
domperidone online – buy motilium generic cyclobenzaprine 15mg price
buy motilium no prescription – order flexeril purchase flexeril online
brand inderal – order inderal 10mg generic order methotrexate 10mg without prescription
coumadin ca – order reglan 10mg generic buy cozaar 50mg