Tesla asks shareholders to approve 3-for-1 stock split amid market plunge

News

Tesla Inc. said it will ask shareholders to approve a 3-for-1 stock split at their August annual meeting, according to a proxy statement filed Friday after the market close.

The stock jumped 1.9 percent in postmarket trading on the news. The proposed split in the form of a dividend comes amid a sharp selloff in Tesla, which saw its shares underperform broad markets. The stock is down nearly 35 percent this year, compared with a 18 percent drop for the S&P 500.

The company also said Larry Ellison will step down from the board. Ellison, the 11th richest person in the world worth about $87 billion, originally made his fortune as the co-founder of the software company Oracle Corp., and first joined Tesla’s board in December 2018. As of June 30, Ellison held a 1.5 percent stake in the EV maker, according to Bloomberg data.

Elon Musk‘s EV company first announced its plan for a stock split on March 28 via a tweet that lacked further details. The shareholder meeting will be held on Aug. 4 both virtually and in Austin, Texas, where the company is based.

If approved, this will be Tesla’s second split in less than two years. The company executed a five-for-one stock split in 2020, leading to a 60 percent surge in the share price from the day of the announcement to the execution date. The EV maker is clearly hoping that will happen again, as having the shares trade at a lower price could entice its strong fan base among individual investors.

Still, anyone betting on a repeat of 2020’s success might want to temper those expectations, as the market environment may not be as welcoming for this strategy as it once was. Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. unveiled 20-for-1 stock splits in February and March, respectively, and both shares are down about 20 percent since the announcements, well underperforming the S&P 500.

And the steady erosion of Tesla’s stock over the past few months suggests its big and loyal following among retail traders may not be able to counteract the overall souring in investor sentiment on the company, especially with risk-appetite generally low. The company also recently lost its top spot at the flagship fund of one its most ardent backers, Cathie Wood, as it was replaced by Zoom Video Communications Inc.

Meanwhile, proposals by Tesla shareholders include corporate governance-related items such as the right of employees to form a union and Tesla’s efforts to prevent sexual harassment and racial discrimination.

“In 2021, the National Labor Relations Board upheld a 2019 ruling that Tesla illegally fired a worker involved in union organizing, and that the CEO had illegally threatened workers regarding unionization,” according to a stockholder proposal cited in Tesla’s filing.

In March, Musk invited the UAW to hold a vote at Tesla’s California factory. But “Tesla does not have any formal policy commitments to respect the right to freedom of association, nor has it demonstrated how it would effectively operationalize such a commitment,” the proposal said.

Tesla’s board advised a vote against the proposal, saying Tesla recently increased the base pay for its manufacturing jobs and it is “actively engaged” in protecting employees’ rights.

Shareholders also proposed an annual report on Tesla’s efforts to prevent sexual harassment and racial discrimination after it was hit by a string of lawsuits.

A California civil rights agency filed a lawsuit accusing Tesla of failing for years to address widespread racist conduct at its Fremont assembly plant. Tesla has opposed the suit and filed a counterclaim that contends the agency never properly investigated the allegations.

Tesla said it does not “tolerate discrimination, harassment, retaliation or any mistreatment of employees in the workplace.”

Another resolution asked Tesla to evaluate the “impact of Tesla’s current use of arbitration on the prevalence of harassment and discrimination in its workplace.”

Shareholders also called on the company to report its polices to address perceived lack of gender and racial diversity at its board. 

Reuters and Automotive News contributed to this report.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Team principal Ward leaves McLaren IndyCar team
2024 Subaru Crosstrek Sport Review: Playing It Safe For Better And Worse
Hackers Steal MLB Star Kris Bryant’s $200K Lamborghini By Rerouting Delivery
2025 Lexus LS gets another price bump, starts at $81,685
Guest commentary: Every step counts to drive down greenhouse gas emissions with green materials

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *